spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    


Right arrow Help viewing high resolution images
Right arrow Return to article
(Downloading may take up to 30 seconds.
If the slide opens in your browser, select File -> Save As to save it.)

Click on image to view larger version.


Figure 10


Fig. 10. Effect of exogenous 4.1B expression on the chemotaxis of T15 sarcoma cells. The motility of cells in the Dunn chemotaxis chamber was recorded 5 hours after microinjection and evaluated in a way similar to experiments presented in Fig. 2A. (A,B) Cell tracks with starting points shifted to a common origin are for uninjected cells (A) and in cells expressing a mixture of 4.1B and GFP (B). Bar, 100 µm. The speed of cell migration of the expressing cells was significantly reduced 2.3 times (ANOVA P<0.02; numbers of time-lapse recordings and cells were 14 and 41, respectively, for uninjected cells, and 9 and 29, respectively, for cells expressing 4.1B and GFP). (C,D) Circular histograms of cells that migrated 10 µm for uninjected cells (C) and for cells expressing 4.1B and GFP (D). Arrow (mean direction) and a grey wedge (its 95% confidence interval) indicate unimodal significant clustering of the directions (Rayleigh test P<0.001). The chemotactic response, measured by the displacement in the gradient direction, is significantly different (ANOVA P<0.05; numbers of cells that migrated 10 µm were 41 for uninjected cells and 27 for cells expressing 4.1B and GFP).





Right arrow Return to article