|
|
|
||||
| Home Help Feedback Subscriptions Archive Search Table of Contents | |||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||
i2 protein splice variant in the formation of an intracellular dopamine D2 receptor poolFiles in this Data Supplement:
Fig. S1. Characterization and specificity of sGi2 antibodies. (A) In western blots, incubation with anti-sGi2 recognized a polypeptide of 39 kDa (arrow) in whole rat brain as well as in cortex and striatum of monkey brain. However, this protein band was not observed when preimmune serum or peptide preabsorbed antibody was used. (B) Immunoblots of BHK cells expressing sGi2 protein showed reactivity to a protein band of 41 kDa (arrow) and not to cells expressing Gi1, Gi2, Gi3, GS or GO. Incubation with preimmune serum and preabsorbed antibody also did not show any reaction in cells with sGi2. (C) Second antibody from different epitope of sGi2 protein (Ab 332-342) showed similar reactivity on western blot as first antibody (Ab 343-354) in rat brain. Sizes of standard proteins are indicated in far left. Together these results suggest that antibody (Ab 343-354) is specific and subtype selective to sGi2 protein. Antibody (Ab 343-354) was used throughout the studies of this manuscript except in this figure where the use of other antibody (Ab 332-342) is clearly indicated. Antibodies to D2S and D2L has been characterized and published previously (Khan et al., 1998, 2001).
Fig. S2. sGi2 reduces the efficiency of blockade of D2-agonist-mediated Ca2+ influx in NG 108-15 cells. In contrast to antagonist, 10 μM of quinpirole, an agonist of dopamine D2 receptor, inhibits Ca2+ influx when D2 receptor alone was expressed, however, co-expression of sGi2 significantly reduced the efficiency of this inhibition. Expression of Gi2 in place of sGi2 did not show this change. *P<0.05, significant change from control. We have shown in main manuscript that D2 antagonist treatment increases voltage-gated intracellular Ca2+ flow (Chronwall et al., 1995; Pauwels et al.,2001) in cells expressing dopamine D2 receptor, here we show that activation by agonist blocks its flow (Lledo et al., 1990; Wolfe and Morris, 1999) in the same cells. However, when sGi2 is co-expressed, these cells show lower blockade activity due to reduced numbers of D2 receptor at plasma membrane.
Fig. S3. Intracellular Ca2+ stores did not contribute to D2 drug-mediated Ca2+ changes. Addition of IP3 receptor inhibitor, 2-aminoethoxydiphenyl borate (APB), in reaction did not show any effect in Ca2+ influx. However, experiments with Ca2+-free medium or medium with 5 mM EGTA and 8 mM CoCl2, both blockers of membrane Ca2+ channels, showed no Ca2+ response. These results demonstrate that Ca2+ change observed in cells was due to activity in membrane-bound Ca2+ channels.
Fig. S4. sGi2 protein is localized in dendrites (A,B), in spines (C,D) and in axons (D). (A) Immunolabeling in dendrite (d; indicated by hollow arrows). (B) Immunolabeled dendrite is making both symmetric (arrows) and asymmetric (arrowhead) synaptic contacts with unlabeled axons (an). (C) Labeling was often seen in or near neck of spines (∼70%), which were originating from dendrites (hollow arrowheads). (D) shows the labeled axons (a) making asymmetric contacts (arrowheads) with labeled as well as unlabeled spines (sn).Bars, 500 nm (A,C), 200 nm (B,D). In addition to neurons, strong immunolabeling was also observed in neuronal elements, such as dendrites, axons and spines, where information traffic is very high. In contrast to the report of Wedegaertner (2002), our findings of sGi2 protein localization in far distant sites from neuronal cell body where it is synthesized, in axons, dendrites and spines suggest that this protein is very stable. Furthermore, our findings are in agreement with other reports (Montmayeur and Borrelli, 1994; Picetti and Borrelli, 2000). For methodological description on electron microscopy, see Khan et al., 1998; Khan et al., 2001.
Fig. S5. Protein expression analysis of deletion constructs of sGi2 in BHK cells. The protein expression of a-f constructs (as shown in Fig. 6 of the manuscript) were tested in cells by immunoblotting. The antibody against sGi2 protein residues, 674-687 (GenBank AY677118), common in all constructs, was prepared as described in Experimental Procedures of the manuscript. This antibody (Ab 674-687) recognized single polypeptide bands of 41, 40, 37, 27, 32 and 28 kDa size in cells expressing sGi2-WT (a), Gαi2-WT (b), sGi2-N1 (c), sGi2-N2 (d), sGi2-C1 (e), and sGi2-C2 (f), respectively. These results confirm the expression of correct size sGi2 deletion constructs in experiments discussed in Fig. 6.
| ||||||||||||||||||||