spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

First published online 30 October 2007
doi: 10.1242/jcs.016972


Journal of Cell Science 120, 4025-4034 (2007)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2007
This Article
Right arrow Summary Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplementary Material
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in JCS
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Facucho-Oliveira, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by St. John, J. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Facucho-Oliveira, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by St. John, J. C.

Mitochondrial DNA replication during differentiation of murine embryonic stem cells

Joao M. Facucho-Oliveira1,*, Jon Alderson1, Emma C. Spikings1, Stuart Egginton2 and Justin C. St. John1,*,{ddagger}

1 The Mitochondrial and Reproductive Genetics Group, The Medical School, The University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK
2 The Angiogenesis Research Group, The Medical School, The University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK


Figure 1
View larger version (8K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 1. Loss of pluripotency during spontaneous differentiation of R1 mESCs. Expression of the pluripotency-associated genes Dppa5, Pramel7 and Ndp52l1 was quantified on undifferentiated (Und) and spontaneously differentiated R1 mESCs (days 1-8) using RT-PCR relative quantification. Expression of individual genes was compared with the expression in undifferentiated R1 mESCs and samples were normalised to Gapdh. Bars represent mean ± s.e.m.; significant differences between days are indicated (*P<0.05, ***P<0.001).

 

Figure 2
View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 2. MtDNA copy number/cell and expression of mtDNA replication factors during spontaneous differentiation of R1 mESCs (days 1-13). (A) MtDNA was quantified using real-time PCR and normalised to the Gapdh gene. The x axis is as in B. (B) Expression of Polg, Polg2 and Tfam was quantified on undifferentiated (Und) and spontaneously differentiated R1 mESCs using RT-PCR relative quantification. Expression of each gene was compared with that of the undifferentiated R1 mESCs and samples were normalised to Gapdh. Bars represent mean ± s.e.m.; significant differences between days are indicated (*P<0.05, **P<0.01, ***P<0.001).

 

Figure 3
View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 3. The number of mtDNA copies/cell and expression of mtDNA replication factors during spontaneous differentiation of D3 mESCs (days 1-7). (A) The number of mtDNA copies/cell in undifferentiated (Und) and spontaneously differentiated D3 mESCs was determined using real-time PCR. The x axis is as in B. (B) The level of Polg, Polg2 and Tfam expression was quantified using RT-PCR relative quantification. Expression of individual genes was compared with the level of expression in undifferentiated D3 mESCs. All samples were normalised to Gapdh. Bars represent mean ± s.e.m.; significant differences between days are indicated (*P<0.05, **P<0.01, ***P<0.001).

 

Figure 4
View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 4. Detection and localisation of mtDNA, and of the MT-CO1 and POLG proteins, during spontaneous differentiation of D3 mESCs. (A) Immunofluorescence analysis of BrdU (red) and MitoTracker (green) on undifferentiated (Und) and spontaneously differentiated D3 mESCs (days 1-7). Percentages represent the proportion of cells with an expanded cytoplasm at each time point. (B) Immunofluorescence analysis of MT-CO1 (green) and POLG (red) on undifferentiated (Und) and differentiated D3 mESCs (days 1-7). Blue, DNA. Bar, 10 µm.

 

Figure 5
View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 5. Effect of RA-induced differentiation on the mtDNA copy number/cell and expression of Polg, Polg2 and Tfam (days 1-7). (A) The number of mtDNA molecules/cell was determined using real-time PCR and normalised to the Gapdh gene. The x axis is as in B. (B) Polg, Polg2 and Tfam expression in undifferentiated (Und) and RA-induced D3 mESCs. RT-PCR relative quantification compared the expression of individual genes to their expression in undifferentiated D3 mESCs. Values for each gene were normalised to Gapdh expression. Bars represent mean ± s.e.m. Significant differences between undifferentiated and days 1, 3, 4 and 6 are indicated above the respective bar representing the stage of differentiation; the significant difference between days 3 and 7 is shown next to the connecting line (*P<0.05, **P<0.01, ***P<0.001).

 

Figure 6
View larger version (35K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 6. The effect of siRNA-mediated knockdown of POLG in undifferentiated CCE/R mESCs. Pooled cell lysates were prepared from FACS non-transfected and siRNA-transfected CCE/R. Equal amounts of protein (100 µg) were electrophoresed on a 9% SDS-PAGE gel then semi-dry blotted onto a polyvinyl difluoride membrane. The membrane was probed for β-actin, POLG, OCT4 and brachyury with the membrane being stripped between each probing. Lane 1, non-transfected undifferentiated CCE/R mESCs; lane 2, undifferentiated CCE/R mESCs transfected with negative control siRNA (75 nM); lane 3, undifferentiated CCE/R mESCs transfected with siRNA targeting POLG (75 nM); lane 4, human embryonic kidney cells; lane 5, mouse embryonic fibroblasts.

 





© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2007