spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

First published online 19 December 2006
doi: 10.1242/jcs.03333


Journal of Cell Science 120, 289-298 (2007)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2007
This Article
Right arrow Summary Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplementary Material
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in JCS
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Evans, I. R.
Right arrow Articles by Nobes, C. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Evans, I. R.
Right arrow Articles by Nobes, C. D.

Ena/VASP proteins mediate repulsion from ephrin ligands

Iwan R. Evans1, Thomas Renne2, Frank B. Gertler3 and Catherine D. Nobes1,4,*

1 Department of Biochemistry, School of Medical Sciences, University of Bristol, University Walk, Bristol, BS8 1TD, UK
2 Institute for Clinical Biochemistry and Pathobiochemistry, University of Würtzburg, Würtzburg, Germany
3 Department of Biology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA
4 Department of Physiology, School of Medical Sciences, University of Bristol, University Walk, Bristol, BS8 1TD, UK


Figure 1
View larger version (54K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 1. Neural crest cells avoid substrate-bound ephrin stripes. Neural crest cells avoid stripes of substrate-bound ephrin-B2-Fc, undergoing repeated cycles of lamellipodial protrusion and collapse at sites of contact with ephrin-B2-Fc. (A) Cells distal to the neural tube explant avoided the ephrin-B2-Fc stripes and exhibited a striped pattern on the coverslip. (B) Neural crest cells on negative control stripes failed to discriminate between the sets of stripes. (C) Neural crest cells that contact substrate-bound ephrin-B2-Fc (lighter broader stripe) undergo a dramatic loss of lamellipodia (black arrow). (D) Neural crest cells undergo cycles of protrusion (red arrows) and retraction (black arrows) along the edges of substrate-bound ephrin-B2-Fc stripes. (E) Retraction from ephrin-B2-Fc (pink overlay) is associated with membrane ruffling (black arrows) and the internalisation of phase bright vesicles (red arrows). A red asterisk denotes the cell to which timepoints refer. Bars, 130 µm; ephrin stripes are 40 µm wide.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (70K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 2. Soluble ephrins destabilise neural crest cell lamellipodia. (A) Neural crest cells were examined using timelapse videomicroscopy for 30 minutes and then stimulated with 2 µg/ml pre-clustered ephrin-B2-Fc for 45-60 minutes. The withdrawal of neural crest cell lamellipodia (red arrow) was associated with membrane ruffling (red arrowhead) following contact with the ephrin-B2-Fc stripe. (B) Membrane ruffling led to the internalisation of phase bright vesicles. (C) Lamellipodial dynamics were analysed by kymography prior to stimulation (15.5±1.2 peaks/hour) and in the presence of 2 µg/ml pre-clustered ephrin-B2-Fc (25.2±1.1 peaks/hour); in the presence of ephrin-B2-Fc the lifetime of protrusions was decreased (P<0.05, n=9). A representative kymograph from a total of nine neural crest cells examined is shown (three separate timelapse movies). (D) A trace of the kymograph shown in C. Bars, 10 µm.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (63K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 3. Wild-type MEFs express Eph receptors and respond repulsively to substrate-bound ephrin stripes. Wild-type MEFs were stimulated for 0, 5, 15 and 30 minutes with 1 µg/ml pre-clustered ephrin-A5-Fc and then lysed in immunoprecipitation buffer. Endogenous EphA4 was immunoprecipitated using mouse anti-EphA4. (A) Samples were western blotted for phospho-tyrosine (p-Y) and EphA4 to demonstrate EphA4 activation and loading, respectively. Bars, 130 µm. (B-D) 6x103 wild-type MEFs (green; F-actin staining) were plated to human Fc (negative control; B), ephrin-A5-Fc (C), or ephrin-B2-Fc (D) stripes and incubated for 18 hours. (E) Graph shows the average percentage of cells (+ 1 s.e.m. error bars, n=4) avoiding ephrin stripes and the equivalent stripe in the matched negative controls for those experiments. The difference between these values represents the repulsive response to a particular ephrin ligand (black arrow).

 

Figure 4
View larger version (36K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 4. Ena/VASP proteins are required for repulsion from substrate-bound ephrin stripes. (A-D) Wild-type MEFs, VASP–/– MEFs and MVD7 cells bind pre-clustered ephrin-A5-Fc, demonstrating Eph receptor expression (A,C,D); pre-clustered human Fc, applied as a negative control, was not bound by these cells (wild-type MEFs shown in B). (E) The loss of VASP and/or Mena does not prevent the activation of endogenous Eph receptors: EphA4 immunoprecipitations showed an increase in phospho-tyrosine (p-Y) following stimulation with 1 µg/ml pre-clustered ephrin-A5-Fc for 15 minutes, compared to unstimulated cells (0 minute) for each cell type. (F) The repulsive responses of VASP–/– MEFs and MVD7 cells were reduced compared to those of wild-type MEFs. Results are the means and s.e.m. from three or four experiments, with 600-800 cells counted for each condition. Means are significantly different from Wt MEF controls (denoted by *), according to Student's t-test [P<0.05, n=3 (VASP–/– cells) or 4 (MVD7 cells)]. Bars, 20 µm (A-D).

 

Figure 5
View larger version (59K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 5. Ena/VASP proteins localise to sites of Eph receptor activation. (A) Schematic diagram of the neighbouring cell injection assay (see Marston et al., 2003Go): EphB4-expressing cells (green) make p-Eph-positive protrusions (red) under ephrin-B2-expressing cells (blue), which subsequently collapse rearwards as membrane ruffles. This leads to the internalisation of p-Eph and cell-cell separation around 3 hours post-injection. (B,C) Non-injected, starved Swiss 3T3 cells were stained for VASP (B) and Mena (C) to demonstrate localisation in the absence of Eph receptor activation. (D-G) Swiss 3T3 fibroblasts were injected with pCIneo-EphB4 (B4) or pRK5-ephrin-B2 (*) and left to express for 2-3.5 hours, then fixed and co-stained for activated Eph receptors using anti-phospho-tyrosine (p-Y) or anti-p-Eph antibodies (red in merged images) and EphB4 (D,E), VASP (F) or Mena (G; green in merged images). EphB4 and p-Eph staining overlap at sites of EphB4-ephrin-B2 contact, including in some internalised vesicles (D,E). VASP (F) and Mena (G) localise to the EphB4/ephrin-B2 interface at sites of Eph receptor activation and are often found at the margins of protrusions made by EphB4-expressing cells at these sites. Bars, 20 µm.

 

Figure 6
View larger version (61K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig. 6. Ena/VASP proteins are necessary for the internalisation of p-Eph in response to cell surface-bound ephrin-B2. (A-D) Swiss 3T3 fibroblasts in a starved, confluent monolayer were injected with 200 µg/ml pRK5-ephrin-B2 and 100 µg/ml biotin-dextran adjacent to cells co-injected with 100 µg/ml pCIneo-EphB4 and either 100 µg/ml pcDNA3-EGFP-APPPP-mito (A,B) or pcDNA-EGFP-FPPPP-mito (C,D) and left to express for 3.5 hours. Cells were then fixed and stained for biotin-dextran (blue) and p-Eph (red) to detect ephrin-B2- and EphB4-expressing cells, respectively; EGFP fluorescence (green) revealed expression of FPPPP-mito or APPPP-mito (A and C also show F-actin staining in green). The APPPP-mito-expressing cells showed internalisation of p-Eph (A,B). By contrast, p-Eph internalisation was inhibited in FPPPP-mito-expressing cells, with p-Eph staining instead remaining at sites of EphB4-ephrin-B2 contact (C,D). (E) Cells that expressed EphB4 and FPPPP/APPPP-mito, contacting ephrin-B2-expressing cells were scored for internalisation of p-Eph and the presence of large, invasive protrusions. FPPPP-mito expression significantly reduced the percentage of cells that internalised activated Eph receptors compared to APPPP-mito (P<0.05, n=5), with 193 (APPPP-mito) and 119 (FPPPP-mito) cells counted for each condition (five separate experiments). No difference was observed in the proportion of cells that displayed large, invasive protrusions. Bars, 10 µm.

 





© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2007