First published online 8 March 2005
doi: 10.1242/jcs.01710
Journal of Cell Science 118, 1363-1372 (2005)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2005
O-glycosylation is essential for intracellular targeting of synaptotagmins I and II in non-neuronal specialized secretory cells
Yafit Atiya-Nasagi1,
Hila Cohen1,
Ora Medalia1,
Mitsunori Fukudan2 and
Ronit Sagi-Eisenberg1,*
1 Department of Cell and Developmental Biology, Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 69978, Israel
2 Fukuda Initiative Research Unit, RIKEN, 2-1 Hirosawa, Wako, Saitama, 351-0198, Japan

View larger version (13K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1. Schematic representation of constructs used in this study. The diagrams show the positions of the chimeric proteins comprising Syt I and Syt II. C, cytosolic domain; HA, hemagglutinin; J, juxtamembrane domain; L, luminal domain; T7, 11 residue peptide (MASMTGGQQMG) derived from the major capsid protein of the T7 phage; TM, transmembrane domain.
|
|

View larger version (75K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3. Visualization of the cellular localization of Syt I and Syt II chimeric proteins. (A) RBL cells transiently double transfected with HA-Syt I/Syt II and T7-Syt I cDNA were grown on glass coverslips and labeled with polyclonal anti-HA and monoclonal anti-T7 antibodies followed by Rhodamine-conjugated donkey anti-mouse and FITC-conjugated donkey anti-rabbit IgG. (B) RBL cells transiently transfected with HA-Syt I/Syt II cDNA were grown on glass coverslips and double stained with polyclonal anti-HA and monoclonal anti-serotonin antibodies followed by Rhodamine-conjugated donkey anti-rabbit and FITC-conjugated donkey anti-mouse IgG. (C) RBL cells, transiently transfected with HA-Syt II (1-183aa)/Syt I (a), HA-Syt II (1-86aa)/Syt I (b) or HA-Syt II (1-60aa)/Syt I (c) cDNA, were grown on glass coverslips and stained with monoclonal anti-HA antibodies. Cells were processed for immunofluorescent staining and visualized by confocal microscopy. Bar, 10 µm.
|
|

View larger version (37K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4. Subcellular fractionation of HA-Syt I/Syt II- or HA-Syt II/Syt I-expressing RBL cells. Cell homogenates derived from RBL cells transiently transfected with HA-Syt I/Syt II or HA-Syt II(1-183aa)/Syt I cDNA were fractionated on continuous sucrose gradients as described previously (Baram et al., 1999 ). Fractions were collected from the top, subjected to SDS-PAGE and immunoblotted with anti-HA antibodies. Fractions were also examined for ß-hexosaminidase activity (presented as OD at 405 nm).
|
|

View larger version (63K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5. Biosynthetic routes of Syt I and Syt II. RBL cells, transiently transfected with Syt II (a-c) or T7-Syt I (d-g) cDNA, were grown on glass coverslips for 1 hour (a-f) or 5 hours (g) and then incubated for 2 hours at 20°C (a-f) or for 1 hour at 4°C in the presence of monoclonal antibodies directed against T7 (1 µg/ml) (g). Cells were subsequently transferred to 37°C (time zero) and incubated for the indicated time periods. Cells were stained with polyclonal antibodies directed against C2A-Syt IX (a-c) or with monoclonal antibodies directed against T7 (d-f) followed by Cy3-conjugated secondary antibodies. Cells were visualized by laser confocal microscopy. Bar, 5 µm.
|
|

View larger version (71K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6. Effect of inhibitors of internalization on HA-Syt I/Syt II trafficking. RBL cells transiently transfected with HA-Syt I/Syt II cDNA were grown on glass coverslips for 1 hour and subsequently incubated for 2 hours at 20°C (a). Cells were then warmed to 37°C for 3 hours in the absence (b) or presence of chloroquine (100 µM) (c) or sucrose (0.45 M) (d). Cells were subsequently stained with monoclonal anti-HA antibodies followed by Cy3-conjugated secondary antibody. Cells were processed for immunofluorescence and visualized by laser confocal microscopy. Bar, 5 µm.
|
|

View larger version (91K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7. Cellular localization of GFP-tagged Syt II. RBL cells stably transfected with Syt II-GFP (A) or Flag-Syt II-GFP (A,B) were grown on glass coverslips and either left untreated (A) or were serum starved for 1 hour and subsequently incubated for the indicated time periods with Texas Red-conjugated Tfn (50 µg/ml) (B). Cells were fixed and visualized by laser confocal microscopy. Bar, 10 µm.
|
|

View larger version (48K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 8. Western blot analysis of HA-Syt II expressed in RBL cells. Cell extracts (80 µg) derived from RBL cells stably transfected with either (A) non-tagged Syt II (1) or HA-Syt II (2) cDNA, or (B) Syt II-GFP or Flag-Syt II-GFP cDNA or (C) transiently transfected with T7-Syt I, T7-Syt I(T15/16/A) or T7-Syt I(T26/A) cDNA, were resolved by SDS-PAGE and subjected to immunoblotting with either monoclonal anti-Syt II or anti-HA antibodies as indicated (A), or anti-GFP antibodies (B), or anti-T7 antibodies (C). The positions of the molecular mass markers are shown on the right in A. Arrows point to fully, partially or non-modified immunoreactive proteins.
|
|

View larger version (44K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 10. Visualization of T7-Syt I and Syt II glycosylation mutants. RBL cells transiently transfected with T7-Syt I(T26/A) (a) or T7-Syt I(T15/16/A) (b) or Syt II(T17/18/19/A) (c) were grown on glass coverslips for 24 hours and subsequently labeled with anti-T7 monoclonal antibodies (a,b) or polyclonal antibodies directed against C2A-Syt IX (c) followed by the relevant Cy3-conjugated (a,c) or Cy2-conjugated secondary antibodies. Cells were processed for immunofluorescent staining and visualized by confocal microscopy. The z-line image is of the same field as in b and confirms the plasma membrane localization of the O mutant. Bar, 10 µm.
|
|
© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2005