spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

First published online 22 February 2005
doi: 10.1242/jcs.01706


Journal of Cell Science 118, 1129-1137 (2005)
Published by The Company of Biologists 2005
This Article
Right arrow Summary Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Vadlamudi, U.
Right arrow Articles by Amendt, B. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Vadlamudi, U.
Right arrow Articles by Amendt, B. A.

PITX2, ß-catenin and LEF-1 interact to synergistically regulate the LEF-1 promoter

Usha Vadlamudi1, Herbert M. Espinoza1, Mrudula Ganga1, Donna M. Martin2, Xiaoming Liu3, John F. Engelhardt3 and Brad A. Amendt1,*

1 Department of Biological Science, The University of Tulsa, 600 S College Ave., Tulsa, OK 74104-3189, USA
2 Department of Pediatrics and Human Genetics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
3 Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology, University of Iowa College of Medicine, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA



View larger version (15K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Activation of the LEF-1 promoter by PITX2. (A) Human LEF-1 promoter elements used in the transfection assays. PITX2 binding sites (Bicoid sites) are denoted by an asterisk (*). (B) CHO cells were transfected with 5 µg of the appropriate human LEF-1 luciferase reporter constructs. The cells were co-transfected with 2.5 µg of either the CMV-PITX2A, or the CMV plasmid without PITX2 (vector control). CHO cell lysates transfected with empty vector were used as a control to show lack of endogenous PITX2 protein in CHO cells. To control for transfection efficiency, all transfections included the SV-40 ß-galactosidase reporter. Cells were incubated for 24 hours, and then assayed for luciferase and ß-galactosidase activities. The activities are shown as mean fold activation compared with the LEF-1 promoter plasmids without PITX2 expression and normalized to ß-galactosidase activity (± s.e.m. from four independent experiments). PITX2 expression did not change the levels of ß-galactosidase activity in the transfected cells.

 


View larger version (12K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. PITX2 isoforms differentially regulate the LEF-1 promoter. CHO cells were transfected as described in Fig. 1, using the three major PITX2 isoforms. The activities are shown as mean fold activation compared with the LEF-1 promoter plasmid without PITX2 expression and normalized to ß-galactosidase activity (± s.e.m. from four independent experiments).

 


View larger version (10K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. LEF-1 and PITX2 synergistically activate the LEF-1 promoter. CHO cells were transfected as in Fig. 1, with CMV-PITX2A or CMV-LEF-1, or both, and the CMV empty expression vector. The activities are shown as mean fold activation compared with the LEF-1 promoter plasmid without PITX2 expression and normalized to ß-galactosidase activity (± s.e.m. from four independent experiments). LEF-1 expression did not change the levels of ß-galactosidase activity in the transfected cells.

 


View larger version (44K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. LEF-1 physically interacts with PITX2. (A) GST-LEF-1 pull-down assay with bacterial expressed and purified PITX2A protein (200 ng). PITX2A binds to immobilized GST-LEF-1, showing that PITX2A can physically interact with LEF-1. The bound protein was detected by western blot using the PITX2 antibody, P2R10. As a control GST-beads were incubated with purified PITX2A to show the specificity of binding to LEF-1. (B) GST-ß-catenin and GST-PITX2A pull-down assay with bacterial expressed and purified LEF-1 protein (50 ng). LEF-1 binds to immobilized GST-ß-catenin as expected and used as a positive control. LEF-1 binds to GST-PITX2A in a reciprocal experiment shown in A. The bound protein was detected by western blot using a LEF-1 antibody. As a control, GST-beads were incubated with purified LEF-1 to show the specificity of binding to ß-catenin and PITX2A.

 


View larger version (33K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. LEF-1 binds to the C-terminal tail of PITX2. (A) The PITX2 deletion constructs used to map the LEF-1 interaction. (B) GST-PITX2A, GST-PITX2 HD (homeodomain only), GST-PITX2 C173 (C-terminal tail only) and GST-PITX2 {Delta}173 (deletion of the C-terminal tail) pull-down assay with bacterial expressed and purified LEF-1 protein (50 ng). LEF-1 binds to GST-PITX2A and GST-PITX2 C173 but not to GST-PITX2 HD or GST-PITX2 {Delta}173. The bound protein was detected by western blot using a LEF-1 antibody. As a control GST-beads were incubated with purified LEF-1 to show the specificity of binding to PITX2A.

 


View larger version (15K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6. The LEF-1 WRE represses PITX2 activation. (A) The WRE deletion in the LEF-1 promoter compared with the full-length LEF-1 promoter. (B) CHO cells were transfected as in Fig. 1, with CMV-PITX2 isoforms and the CMV empty expression vector with the appropriate LEF-1 luciferase reporter constructs. The activities are shown as mean fold activation compared with the LEF-1 promoter plasmid without PITX2 expression and normalized to ß-galactosidase activity (± s.e.m. from four independent experiments).

 


View larger version (26K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7. ß-catenin and PITX2 synergistically activate the LEF-1 promoter independent of the WRE. (A) CHO cells were transfected as in Fig. 6, with CMV-PITX2C or CMV-ß-catenin S37A, or both, and the CMV empty expression vector with the appropriate LEF-1 luciferase reporter constructs. The activities are shown as mean fold activation compared with the LEF-1 promoter plasmid without PITX2 or ß-catenin expression and normalized to ß-galactosidase activity (± s.e.m. from four independent experiments). (B) GST-ß-catenin pull-down assay with bacterial expressed and purified PITX2A protein (200 ng). PITX2A binds to immobilized GST-ß-catenin. The bound protein was detected by western blot using a PITX2 antibody. As a control GST-beads were incubated with purified PITX2A to show the specificity of binding to ß-catenin.

 


View larger version (11K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 8. Combinatorial effect of PITX2, LEF-1 and ß-catenin on LEF-1 promoter activity. (A) CHO cells were transfected as in Fig. 1, with CMV-PITX2C, CMV-LEF-1 or CMV-ß-catenin S37A, or combinations of each, and the CMV empty expression vector. The activities are shown as mean fold activation compared with the LEF-1 promoter plasmid without protein expression and normalized to ß-galactosidase activity (± s.e.m. from four independent experiments). (B) Expression of PITX2 in transfected CHO cell lysates; approximately 10 µg of lysate was used in the western blot. PITX2 expression was similar in cells transfected with LEF-1 or ß-catenin, or both. Bacteria expressed PITX2 protein (100 ng) was used as a control; the protein expressed in transfected cells migrates slower than the bacterially purified protein due to the presence of a Myc/His C-terminal tag.

 





© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2005