spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    


This Article
Right arrow Summary Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gotzmann, J.
Right arrow Articles by Mikulits, W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gotzmann, J.
Right arrow Articles by Mikulits, W.

Hepatocytes convert to a fibroblastoid phenotype through the cooperation of TGF-ß1 and Ha-Ras: steps towards invasiveness

Josef Gotzmann1, Heidemarie Huber1, Christiane Thallinger2, Markus Wolschek2, Burkhard Jansen2, Rolf Schulte-Hermann1, Hartmut Beug3 and Wolfgang Mikulits1,*

1 Institute of Cancer Research, University of Vienna, Borschke-Gasse 8a, A-1090 Vienna, Austria
2 Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Section of Experimental Oncology, Vienna General Hospital, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, A-1090 Vienna, Austria
3 Research Institute of Molecular Pathology, Dr Bohr-Gasse 7, A-1030 Vienna, Austria



View larger version (46K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. MMH-D3 cells display a polarized phenotype and respond to the growth inhibitory function of TGF-ß1. (A) Phase contrast and confocal immunofluorescence microscopy of parental MMH-D3 cells stained with the adherens junction markers E-cadherin and ß-catenin and the tight junction marker ZO-1. (B) Proliferation kinetics of MMH-D3 cells (circles) versus MMH-D3 supplemented with 5 ng/ml TGF-ß1 (squares). (C) Flow cytometry determining the cell cycle distribution of MMH-D3 cells versus MMH-D3 at day 5 of TGF-ß1 (5 ng/ml) treatment.

 


View larger version (23K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Cell cycle progression of MMH cell types and expression of marker proteins. (A) Proliferation kinetics of epithelial (MMH-D3, circles; MMH-R, squares) versus fibroblastoid MMH-RT cells (triangles). (B) Protein abundance of representative components participating in intercellular communication in epithelial and fibroblastoid cells. Besides the exogenous expression of Ha-Ras in epithelial MMH-R and fibroblastoid MMH-RT cells, the downregulation and loss of respective markers is indicated in fibroblastoid cells by immunoblotting.

 


View larger version (131K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. TGF-ß1 triggers an epithelial to fibroblastoid conversion of MMH-R cells expressing constitutive active Ha-Ras. Left panel (—TGF-ß1): MMH-R cells show a polarized epithelial phenotype as analyzed by phase contrast and confocal immunofluorescence microscopy. Right panel (+TGF-ß1): Epithelial MMH-R cells treated with 5 ng/ml TGF-ß1 undergo a conversion to a spindle-shaped fibroblastoid phenotype. The resulting depolarized MMH-RT cell type was processed for microscopical inspection. Exceptionally, cells were stained for Smad2 30 minutes after TGF-ß1 induction. Insets in panels of undetectable E-cadherin and desmoplakin staining indicate the presence of GFP-positive cells.

 


View larger version (55K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Malignant transformation of epithelial MMH-R and fibroblastoid MMH-RT cells analyzed in vitro and in vivo. (A) Phase contrast images depicting the typical colonies formed in vitro by anchorage-independent growth of MMH-R and MMH-RT cells in soft agar. (B) Kinetics of tumor formation in vivo after subcutaneous injection of MMH-R (circles) and MMH-RT cells (squares) into immunocompromized SCID/BALB/c recipient mice. (C) Visualization of endothelial cells in histological sections of tumors by immunological staining with anti-von Willebrand Factor. Insets represent lower magnifications (10x) of histological sections. (D) Dedifferentiation of epithelial MMH-R and fibroblastoid MMH-RT cells after tumor formation in vivo. Histological sections of tumors give rise to poorly differentiated cell carcinomas as shown by immunological staining with ZO-1. The cytoplasmic distribution of ZO-1 appears to be very weak in vascularized MMH-RT-derived tumors, and cell boundary staining is exclusively displayed by endothelial cells (white arrow). (E) Assessment of invasive properties in vitro. The ability of epithelial MMH-R and fibroblastoid MMH-RT cells to migrate through Matrigel matrices as reconstituted basement membranes is shown. Invaded cells on lower surfaces of membranes were visualized by immunofluorescence microscopy of GFP-positive MMH-R and MMH-RT cells.

 


View larger version (92K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. Typical hepatocellular-derived cell structures in collagen gels. (A) A phase contrast image of epithelial MMH-R cells generating lumen-forming structures. (B) Treatment of epithelial MMH-R cells with exogenous TGF-ß1 (5 ng/ml) resulted in the formation of disordered branching cord-like structures.

 


View larger version (30K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6. Molecular characteristics of epithelial MMH-R versus established fibroblastoid MMH-RT cells. (A) TGF-ß1 production of epithelial and fibroblastoid cell types. The amount of latent TGF-ß1 secretion into the medium was determined by ELISA. (B) Semi-quantitative RT-PCR determining the selective decrease (left panel) and increase (right panel) of mRNA abundance in epithelial versus fibroblastoid cells. All samples contained equal amounts of cDNA. As a control, rhoA mRNA expression remained unaffected (right panel). Lane 1, epithelial MMH-R cells; lane 2, fibroblastoid MMH-RT cells.

 


View larger version (98K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7. Reversion of fibroblastoid MMH-RT cells to an epithelium-like phenotype. (A) Phase contrast microscopy of MMH-RT cells (control) grown on tissue culture plates and either treated with 30 µM UO126 or 5 µM LY294.002 for 24 hours. (B) Confocal immunofluorescence microscopy of MMH-RT cells treated with 5 µM LY294.002 for 24 hours. (C) Expression of E-cadherin and MMP-9 as determined by immunoblotting. Staining of glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) is shown as a loading control. Lane 1, fibroblastoid MMH-RT cells; lanes 2 and 3, MMH-RT cells treated with 5 µM LY294.002 for 24 and 72 hours, respectively; lane 4, epithelial MMH-R cells.

 





© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2002