spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    


This Article
Right arrow Summary Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in JCS
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chung, J. Y.
Right arrow Articles by Wu, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Chung, J. Y.
Right arrow Articles by Wu, H.

All TRAFs are not created equal: common and distinct molecular mechanisms of TRAF-mediated signal transduction

Jee Y. Chung, Young Chul Park, Hong Ye and Hao Wu

Department of Biochemistry, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY 10021, USA



View larger version (19K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Sequence characteristics of TRAFs. (A) Domain organization of the mammalian TRAFs. R, RING domain; Z, zinc-finger domain; C-C, coiled-coil domain; TRAF-C, TRAF-C domain. The TRAF domain comprises the coiled-coil domain and the TRAF-C domain. (B) The proposed evolutionary tree for the mammalian, Drosophila and C. elegans TRAFs. This figure is adapted from Grech et al. (Grech et al., 2000Go).

 


View larger version (31K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. TRAF signaling pathways. (A) Membrane-proximal events in TRAF signaling, showing direct receptor-TRAF recruitment and indirect receptor-TRAF interactions. (B) Downstream signaling events for TRAFs, shown here for two representative TRAF family members, TRAF2 and TRAF6.

 


View larger version (42K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Structural studies of upstream interactions of TRAFs. (A) The mushroom-shaped trimeric structure of the TRAF domain of human TRAF2 (left: three-fold axis into the page; right: three-fold axis vertical) is shown here in complex with TNFR2. The coiled-coil region (stalk) is shown as yellow helices. The ß-sheet regions of the three TRAF-C domains are shown respectively in blue, green and purple. Bound peptides from TNFR2 are shown as orange arrows, indicating the direction of the peptide chains. The proposed location of the cellular membrane is shown. This figure is modified from (Park et al., 1999Go). (B) The structural superposition of several TRAF2-interacting receptor peptides is shown using stereo stick models. Nitrogen atoms, blue; oxygen atoms, red; sulfur atoms, green; carbon atoms, yellow (CD40), gray (CD30), green (Ox40), pink (4-1BB), cyan (LMP1) and purple (TNFR2). This figure is adapted from (Ye et al., 1999Go, Ye et al., 1999Go). (C) The crystal structure of the trimeric complex between the TRAF domain of TRAF3 and a CD40 peptide bound in a hairpin configuration (Ni et al., 2000Go). The color-coding of the TRAF domain follows that of (A) and the CD40 peptides are shown as orange arrows. (D) A ribbon diagram of the complex between TRADD and TRAF2 (left, three-fold axis into the page; right, three-fold axis vertical). TRAF2, blue, green and purple; TRADD, magenta, red and yellow. The TRAF2-TRADD interface is more extensive and exhibits higher affinity than TRAF2-receptor-peptide interactions. This figure was adapted from Park et al. (Park et al., 2000Go).

 





© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2002