spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

doi: 10.1242/10.1242/jcs.00066


This Article
Right arrow Summary Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lorenz, A.
Right arrow Articles by Loidl, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lorenz, A.
Right arrow Articles by Loidl, J.

Spatial organisation and behaviour of the parental chromosome sets in the nuclei of Saccharomyces cerevisiae x S. paradoxus hybrids

Alexander Lorenz1, Jörg Fuchs1, Edgar Trelles-Sticken2, Harry Scherthan2 and Josef Loidl1,*

1 Institute of Botany, University of Vienna, Rennweg 14, A-1030 Vienna, Austria
2 Max-Planck-Institute for Molecular Genetics, Ihnestraße 73, D-14195 Berlin, Germany



View larger version (95K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Differential staining of S. cerevisiae and S. paradoxus genomes by FISH with DNA probes from the two species. Red, S. cerevisiae DNA; green, S. paradoxus DNA; blue, DAPI-counterstaining of unlabelled DNA regions. (A) Cells from a mixed S. cerevisiae-S. paradoxus culture. The nuclei are differently marked by simultaneous hybridisation with total genomic DNA probes from the respective species. The halos around the nuclei stem from the differential staining of mitochondria by hybridisation with species-specific mitochondrial DNA sequences that were contained in the probes. (B) S. cerevisiae x S. paradoxus nuclei show a mosaic hybridisation pattern after simultaneous FISH with total genomic DNA from the two parental species, indicating the intermixing of the chromosome complements. (C) Differential labelling of the nuclei of a mixed culture with a Ty1 probe from S. cerevisiae (red) and genomic DNA from S. paradoxus (green). Only S. cerevisiae nuclei are labelled with the Ty1 probe. (D) FISH of a composite single sequence probe (covering most part of the left arm of chromosome IV) from S. cerevisiae to hybrid nuclei. Each nucleus contains a strong (arrowheads) and a weak signal (arrows), corresponding to S. cerevisiae and S. paradoxus chromosomes IV, respectively. This demonstrates that species-specific single sequence probes cross-hybridise only weakly. (E) Hybrid nuclei simultaneously hybridised with rDNA probes from the two parental species. The two rDNA tracts are differentially stained, which indicates the high species-specificity of the rDNA sequences. (F) Trisomic addition strain of S. cerevisiae with an additional chromosome IV from S. paradoxus. The S. paradoxus chromosome occupies a distinct oblong territory (arrows) that is delineated by the S. paradoxus probe. The S. cerevisiae probe highlights the remainder of the nucleus. (G-K) Karyogamy and mixing of the parental genomes in hybrid S. cerevisiae x S. paradoxus zygotes as seen by GISH. The unstained sectors of nuclei (arrowheads) mark the sites of nucleoli where hybridisation of labelled probes was blocked by excess unlabelled rDNA. (G) Haploid parental nuclei in a zygote. (H) Zygote containing a diploid hybrid nucleus after karyogamy. The two genomes are still spatially separated. (I) Incipient intermixing of genomes in a nucleus whose shape suggests that mitosis has started. (J) Overview of a budding zygote at lower magnification with the nucleus in mitosis (similar stage as in I). Phase contrast picture of the entire zygote was merged with the FISH image of the nucleus. (K) Anaphase of a zygote nucleus with the genomes completely mixed. Bar, 2 µm (in F, for A-F); 2 µm (in K, for G-I,K).

 


View larger version (70K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. (A-D) Meiotic pairing in pachytene nuclei of the hybrid SLY2006. (A) Extensive stretches of SC delineated by anti-Zip1 immunostaining. (B) Electron microscopy of silver-stained nuclei shows that the synapsed chromosome portions are connected by axial elements (arrows) and that most chromosomes are engaged in multiple pairing partner switches. (C,D) GISH on spread pachytene nuclei. (C) Pairing between S. cerevisiae and S. paradoxus chromosome regions prevails as most red and green threads are running side-by-side; (left) corresponding DAPI image. The rDNA tract, whose labelling is blocked in GISH is clearly visible (arrow). (D) In this nucleus uniformly red or green staining structures (arrows) indicate synapsis of chromosomes from one and the same genome. (E) Pachytene of the diploid chromosome III substitution strain SLY2007. The chromosome III bivalent is painted green with S. paradoxus genomic DNA; (left) corresponding DAPI image. Arrow denotes the bivalent. Bar, 2 µm.

 





© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2002