
View larger version (28K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6. HA-induced increase of membrane currents in COS-7 (A-E) and in CHO cells (F,G) transfected with GRC-pcDNA3. (A) 400 ms potential steps were applied from -120 mV to 60 mV in increments of 20 mV from a holding potential of -60 mV. Membrane currents recorded in external NaCl solution are shown of a mock-injected COS-7 cell not expressing GRC and of a cell expressing GRC, both after a treatment for 20 minutes with HA. (B) The amplitudes of the membrane currents as determined in A at the end of the pulses were plotted versus the pulse potential. Data points were connected by straight lines (mock, ; GRC, ). (C) Activation of GRC by HA was reduced after application of 10 µM ruthenium red (RR) in an external CsCl solution. Membrane currents were recorded with a 250 ms voltage ramp command from -100 mV to 60 mV from a holding potential of -60 mV. (D) HA-activated GRC was Ca2+ permeable, if the measurement was performed in an external CaCl2 solution, and the currents were blockable by RR. (E) The membrane current of a cell expressing GRC, but not of a mock-injected COS-7 cell, increased after HA application as measured in the perforated-patch configuration using standard external NaCl solution. Membrane currents activated by HA in cells expressing GRC were blocked by application of 1 mM La3+ or 10 µM RR. Dashed lines denote zero current, arrows indicate the time of HA or blocker application (F,G). In CHO cells heterologously expressed GRC was not activated by HA (F), but by serum (G). Membrane currents were elicited as described in (C). In an external CaCl2 solution a CHO cell pretreated with HA for 20 minutes did not exhibit increased membrane currents (F). Pretreatment with 10% fetal calf serum activated GRC-mediated membrane currents, which could be reduced by 10 µM RR (G).
|