
View larger version (60K):
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1. Sequence comparison between the novel T-catenin and other members of the human -catenin/vinculin family. (A) Alignment of the protein sequences by the CLUSTAL W method (Higgins and Sharp, 1989). The location of N-terminal -helices as determined for E-catenin (Pokutta and Weis, 2000) is shown on top of the sequences. Only one of two characteristic proline residues, inducing kinks in the -helices of E-catenin (marked with P below the sequences) is conserved in T-catenin. Other annotated domains of E-catenin are: ß-catenin-binding domains (Pokutta and Weiss, 2000; Huber et al., 1997), the -actinin-binding domain (Nieset et al., 1997), amphiphatic helices possibly responsible for actin binding (Rudiger, 1998). Also indicated is the position of an alternatively spliced insert generally found for N-catenin (Claverie et al., 1993). The sequences aligned here are available from GenBank under accession nos. AF091606 ( T-catenin), D14705 ( E-catenin) and M94151 ( N2-catenin). (B) Schematic protein alignments including amino acid identities (%) between the three main vinculin homology domains (black boxes) (Herrenknecht et al., 1991). As reported before (Janssens et al., 1999), -catulin and vinculin are clearly more distant members of the -catenin/vinculin family. The total size of the depicted proteins is indicated at the right (aa, amino acid residues), whereas residues flanking various domains are indicated by their codon numbers. N, amino-terminus; C, carboxy-terminus.
|