spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    


This Article
Right arrow Summary Freely available
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Movies
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Molnar, M.
Right arrow Articles by Hiraoka, Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Molnar, M.
Right arrow Articles by Hiraoka, Y.

Live observation of fission yeast meiosis in recombination-deficient mutants

a study on achiasmate chromosome segregation

Monika Molnar1, Jürg Bähler2, Jürg Kohli1 and Yasushi Hiraoka3

1 Institute of Cell Biology, University of Bern, CH-3012 Bern, Switzerland
2 The Sanger Centre, Wellcome Trust Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridge, CB10 1SA, UK
3 CREST Research Project of the Japan Science and Technology Corporation, Kansai Advanced Research Center, Communications Research Laboratory, Kobe 651-2492, Japan



View larger version (97K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Prophase nuclear movements in wild-type, rec8 and rec7 mutant cells. Nuclei of strains (A) CRL 152 (wild type), (B) 57-2262 (rec8 mutant) and (C) 88-3485 (rec7 mutant) were stained with Hoechst 33342. Images were taken in a single optical section with 2 minute intervals. Numbers on the left of each image indicate time in minutes. In A, arrows indicate the position of the presumptive telomere cluster. In B, arrows indicate the position of the leading edge of the nucleus. In C, arrows indicate the position of the leading edge of the nucleus; the arrowhead points at the presumptive telomere cluster. Scale bar: 10 µm.

 


View larger version (80K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Nuclear dynamics during the first meiotic division in the rec8 and rec7 mutants. (A) rec8 mutant. Nuclei of strain 57-2262 were stained with Hoechst 33342. Numbers on the right of the images indicate time in minutes. (B,C) rec7 mutant. Nuclei of strain 88-3485 were stained with Hoechst 33342, and two divisions with different outcome were chosen for presentation. Numbers on the left of the images indicate time in minutes. In case of division (B), chromosomes were apparently unevenly distributed between the daughter nuclei. (C) Division resulted in even segregation. Equal numbers of chromosomes moving to opposite poles are clearly discernable at 48 minutes. The arrow indicates a chromosome moving between two poles. Scale bar: 10 µm.

 


View larger version (52K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Selected frames of the second meiotic division. Nuclei of strains CRL 152 (wild type), 57-2262 (rec8), and 88-3485 (rec7) were stained with Hoechst 33342. Numbers on the right of the images indicate time in minutes. Compare the even distribution of nuclear masses in the wild type strain (A) with the irregular divisions seen in rec8 (B) and rec7 (C). Scale bar: 10 µm.

 


View larger version (28K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. GFP images of cen1 in a wild-type homothallic strain in meiosis I. Strain AY 176-17D was induced to undergo meiosis and observed as described in Materials and Methods. Numbers on the left of each image indicate time in minutes. Scale bar: 10 µm.

 


View larger version (39K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. GFP images of cen1 in a rec7 homothallic strain in meiosis I. Meiosis was induced in strain A5, and the divisions were observed as described in Materials and Methods. Numbers on the left of each image represent time in minutes. (A) GFP signals arising from homologous chromosomes which eventually moved to the same pole, resulting in nondisjunction I. The arrow points to the chromosome moving to the same pole as its homolog. (B) Chromosome re-orientation in rec7. The arrow points to the chromosome that moved to the same pole as its homolog and subsequently re-oriented to the other pole. Scale bar: 10 µm.

 


View larger version (27K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6. Precocious separation of sister chromatids in rec8. GFP images of cen1 in the first meiotic division in rec8. Strains A4 and 68-2710 were crossed and observed as described in Materials and Methods. Numbers on the left of each image indicate time in minutes. Note that only one of the strains carries the GFP construct in this cross, thus the separating signals arose from sister chromatids. Scale bar: 10 µm.

 


View larger version (16K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7. Spore numbers in rec+, rec8, rec7, rec14 and rec15 zygotic asci. Strains CRL 152, 57-2262, 88-3485, A1 and A2 were transferred onto sporulation medium and the spore numbers determined by phase contrast microscopy in approximately 200 mature asci.

 


View larger version (42K):

[in a new window]
 
Fig. 8. Ascus formation in recombination-deficient mutants. Morphologies of rec+ (a), rec8 (b), rec7 (c), rec14 (d) and rec15 (e) zygotic asci are shown after visualization of the DNA content by DAPI staining (see Materials and Methods). The same strains were used as in Fig. 8. In contrast to the uniform distribution of nuclear masses in the spores of rec+ asci, each mutant had spores with variable DNA content. Note the large spores in rec7, rec14 and rec15 asci that enclosed more than one DAPI-stainable body. Scale bar: 10 µm.

 





© The Company of Biologists Ltd 2001