spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wilson, P.
Right arrow Articles by Forer, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wilson, P.
Right arrow Articles by Forer, A.

Journal of Cell Science, Vol 94, Issue 4 625-634, Copyright © 1989 by Company of Biologists

JOURNAL ARTICLES

The behaviour of microtubules in chromosomal spindle fibres irradiated singly or doubly with ultraviolet light

P Wilson and A Forer
Biology Department, York University, Ontario, Canada.

Areas of reduced birefringence (ARBs) produced by ultraviolet microbeam irradiation are areas of depolymerized microtubules. ARBs probably move poleward either by microtubule subunit addition at the kinetochore and loss at the pole, or by microtubule subunit addition at one edge of the ARB and loss from the other edge. In this paper we have used two approaches to try to distinguish between these two models. First, we determined whether the edges of the ARB move at the same rate; if ARB motion is due solely to addition at the kinetochore and loss at the pole, with the ARB edges unable to exchange subunits, then the two edges of each ARB should move at the same rate. On the other hand, if the exchange is at the ARB edges, then, from data from microtubules in vitro, the poleward edge should move much faster than the kinetochoreward edge. We found that the two edges of the ARB move at the same rate about half the time, but half the time they do not. Second, we studied the behaviour of two ARBs on a single fibre. If ARB motion is due solely to subunit addition at the kinetochore and loss at the pole, then the two ARBs must move poleward together. We found that after two ARBs are formed on a single fibre the region between the ARBs is unstable and rapidly depolymerizes. These results do not fit either model and suggest that influences of kinetochores and poles or other factors need to be considered that are not duplicated in experiments on microtubules in vitro.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J. Cell Biol.Home page
H. Maiato, C. L. Rieder, and A. Khodjakov
Kinetochore-driven formation of kinetochore fibers contributes to spindle assembly during animal mitosis
J. Cell Biol., December 6, 2004; 167(5): 831 - 840.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Cell Sci.Home page
B. Czaban, A Forer, and A. Bajer
Ultraviolet microbeam irradiation of chromosomal spindle fibres in Haemanthus katherinae endosperm. I. Behaviour of the irradiated region
J. Cell Sci., January 6, 1993; 105(2): 571 - 578.
[Abstract] [PDF]


© The Company of Biologists Ltd 1989