spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Oud, J. L.
Right arrow Articles by Nanninga, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Oud, J. L.
Right arrow Articles by Nanninga, N.

Journal of Cell Science, Vol 92, Issue 3 329-339, Copyright © 1989 by Company of Biologists


JOURNAL ARTICLES

Three-dimensional chromosome arrangement of Crepis capillaris in mitotic prophase and anaphase as studied by confocal scanning laser microscopy

JL Oud, A Mans, GJ Brakenhoff, HT van Der Voort, EA van Spronsen and N Nanninga
Department of Molecular Cell Biology, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

To estimate the extent of ordering of chromosomes, confocal scanning laser microscopy was used to make three-dimensional images from optical sections. For Crepis capillaris, which has 2n = 6 easily recognizable chromosomes, a statistically significant sample of 75 Feulgen-stained root tip anaphases was analysed. A comparison of the observed chromosome ordering and the expected random distribution showed a significant surplus of one of the arrangements with a juxtaposition of the two chromosomes with a nucleolus organizer region. Two of the arrangements with these chromosomes in opposite positions were never observed in our material. Another analysis of 30 mithramycin A-stained prophases and 30 meta- and anaphases showed partly different patterns of non-random chromosome distribution in the two stages of mitosis. A preference for an association of the homologues was observed for all pairs of chromosomes in prophase cells, whereas in meta- and anaphase the association only persisted for the nucleolus organizer chromosomes. This indicates that there may be some relocation of the chromosome positions during the transition from prophase to metaphase. In meta- and anaphase one of the arrangements with juxtaposed NOR chromosomes was preferred, i.e. the ordering in which chromosomes 1 and 3 occupied alternate positions. Probably, the nucleolus is an important factor in producing a non-random distribution, but there could be other factors that influence chromosome ordering as well. A comparison of the anaphase chromosome ordering in C. capillaris plants from very different localities, indicated that the observed non-random distribution was independent of the origin of the material. Existing models of chromosome disposition are not sufficient to explain the observed non-random chromosome ordering in C. capillaris.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Mol. Biol. CellHome page
C. Klein, T. Cheutin, M.-F. O'Donohue, L. Rothblum, H. Kaplan, A. Beorchia, L. Lucas, L. Héliot, and D. Ploton
The Three-dimensional Study of Chromosomes and Upstream Binding Factor-immunolabeled Nucleolar Organizer Regions Demonstrates Their Nonrandom Spatial Arrangement during Mitosis
Mol. Biol. Cell, November 1, 1998; 9(11): 3147 - 3159.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Cell Sci.Home page
M. Montijn, A. Houtsmuller, J. Oud, and N Nanninga
The spatial localization of 18 S rRNA genes, in relation to the descent of the cells, in the root cortex of Petunia hybrida
J. Cell Sci., January 3, 1994; 107(3): 457 - 467.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J. Cell Sci.Home page
G. Jeun and M. Locke
The relative positions of condensed chromosomes are maintained between divisions in the epidermis of Calpodes ethlius
J. Cell Sci., November 1, 1992; 103(3): 839 - 846.
[Abstract] [PDF]




© The Company of Biologists Ltd 1989