|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|||||
| Home Help Feedback Subscriptions Archive Search Table of Contents | |||||
Journal of Cell Science, Vol 91, Issue 4 603-613, Copyright © 1988 by Company of Biologists
JOURNAL ARTICLES |
D Szollosi, R Czolowska, MS Szollosi and AK Tarkowski
Unite de la Fecondation, INRA, Station Centrale de Physiologie Animale, Jouy-en-Josas, France.
The potential of parthenogenetically activated mouse oocytes to remodel somatic cell nuclei was studied by ultrastructural means using oocyte-thymocyte hybrids. Complete nuclear remodeling, initiated by nuclear envelope breakdown and chromosome condensation (which is followed by formation of pronucleus-like nucleus) is possible only during a short time gap between metaphase II and telophase of meiotic division. Maturation-promoting factor activity is high during this period. The thymocyte nucleus can follow the sequence of morphological changes only in concert with the development of the native nucleus and only after exposure of the chromatin to the ooplasm. If hybridization is effected with pronucleate oocytes, the thymocyte nucleus retains its interphase character but shows particular modifications in nucleolar morphology (identical to changes observed during reactivation of the nucleolus in stimulated lymphocyte) and in the activity of the nuclear envelope (blebbing). Thus the nucleus not exposed to maturation-promoting factor activity may be influenced by a 'programme' specific for oocyte (blebbing) and by a programme inherent in the introduced somatic cell nucleus.
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  S.M. Mitalipov, Q. Zhou, J.A. Byrne, W.Z. Ji, R.B. Norgren, and D.P. Wolf Reprogramming following somatic cell nuclear transfer in primates is dependent upon nuclear remodeling Hum. Reprod., August 1, 2007; 22(8): 2232 - 2242. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A. Schurmann, D. N Wells, and B. Oback Early zygotes are suitable recipients for bovine somatic nuclear transfer and result in cloned offspring. Reproduction, December 1, 2006; 132(6): 839 - 848. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. M. Mitalipov, R. R. Yeoman, K. D. Nusser, and D. P. Wolf Rhesus Monkey Embryos Produced by Nuclear Transfer from Embryonic Blastomeres or Somatic Cells Biol Reprod, May 1, 2002; 66(5): 1367 - 1373. [Abstract] [Full Text]
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. A. De Sousa, J. R. Dobrinsky, J. Zhu, A. L. Archibald, A. Ainslie, W. Bosma, J. Bowering, J. Bracken, P. M. Ferrier, J. Fletcher, et al. Somatic Cell Nuclear Transfer in the Pig: Control of Pronuclear Formation and Integration with Improved Methods for Activation and Maintenance of Pregnancy Biol Reprod, March 1, 2002; 66(3): 642 - 650. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
V. Bordignon, H. J. Clarke, and L. C. Smith Developmentally Regulated Loss and Reappearance of Immunoreactive Somatic Histone H1 on Chromatin of Bovine Morula-Stage Nuclei Following Transplantation into Oocytes Biol Reprod, July 1, 1999; 61(1): 22 - 30. [Abstract] [Full Text]
|
|
|
|
|
|
I. Aslam and S. Fishel Evaluation of the fertilization potential of freshly isolated, in-vitro cultured and cryopreserved human spermatids by injection into hamster oocytes Hum. Reprod., June 1, 1999; 14(6): 1528 - 1533. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S.M. Mitalipov, K.L. White, V.R. Farrar, J. Morrey, and W.A. Reed Development of Nuclear Transfer and Parthenogenetic Rabbit Embryos Activated with Inositol 1,4,5-Trisphosphate Biol Reprod, April 1, 1999; 60(4): 821 - 827. [Abstract] [Full Text]
|
|
