spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bailey, J.
Right arrow Articles by Gingell, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bailey, J.
Right arrow Articles by Gingell, D.

Journal of Cell Science, Vol 90, Issue 2 215-224, Copyright © 1988 by Company of Biologists

JOURNAL ARTICLES

Contacts of chick fibroblasts on glass: results and limitations of quantitative interferometry

J Bailey and D Gingell
Department of Genetics, University of Leicester, UK.

We have examined the contacts made by explanted chick heart and limb bud fibroblasts after 24-48 h on glass, using quantitative interference reflection microscopy (IRM). Contacts beneath very thin cytoplasmic lamellae were avoided because the images of such contacts depend on the thickness of the lamellae. Plaque-like focal contacts, distinguished on the basis of shape and low irradiance (darkness), are intimate adhesions to the substratum. These images can be interpreted if it is assumed that microfilaments associated with the lower membrane increase the local cytoplasmic refractive index. The range of irradiances measured for focal contacts was found to be rather wide, and our modelling shows that the most likely explanation for this is that the images receive variable contributions from the adjacent cytoskeleton. For this reason it is particularly difficult to assign a characteristic thickness for these contacts from IRM data. Close contacts, seen principally as 'grey' regions under migrating cells at the edges of the explants, also show a wide range of irradiances. Unlike focal contacts, it is not necessary to postulate any involvement of the cytoskeleton in their images and they can be modelled as regions where an aqueous glycocalyx zone about 20-30 nm thick separates the membrane bilayer from the glass. Paler grey regions that also look like close contacts are apparently formed where the cell surface has lifted several tens of nanometres from the glass.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J. Physiol.Home page
L. Stuwe, M. Muller, A. Fabian, J. Waning, S. Mally, J. Noel, A. Schwab, and C. Stock
pH dependence of melanoma cell migration: protons extruded by NHE1 dominate protons of the bulk solution
J. Physiol., December 1, 2007; 585(2): 351 - 360.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


© The Company of Biologists Ltd 1988