spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by FLAVELL, R. A.
Right arrow Articles by JONES, I. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by FLAVELL, R. A.
Right arrow Articles by JONES, I. G.

Journal of Cell Science, Vol 9, 719-726, Copyright © 1971 by Company of Biologists

Submitted on March 29, 1971

DNA from Isolated Pellicles of Tetrahymena

R. A. FLAVELL 1 and I. G. JONES 1

1 Department of Biochemistry, University of Hull Hull HU6 7RX, U.K.

Large pellicle fragments were isolated from Tetrahymena pyriformis, strain T, by 2 procedures: homogenization after treatment with 40% ethanol at -20 °C, or direct homogenization in a sucrose-EDTA buffer. All preparations contained entrapped mitochondria. DNA prepared from these pellicles was analysed on a CsCl gradient, and contained 3 components of buoyant densities 1.685, 1.688, and 1.698 g cm-3 in variable proportions. The component at 1.685 g cm-3 is similar in density to mitochondrial DNA and those at 1.688 and 1.698g cm-3 to components of nuclear DNA. Most pellicle preparations contained a higher proportion of the heavy component (1.698 g cm-3) than does nuclear DNA. A similar enrichment of this component could be demonstrated in high-speed pellets from fragmented nuclei. No unique pellicle-associated component could be demonstrated. No DNA could be isolated from very pure preparations of oral plates and we conclude that there is no evidence for the presence of a specific DNA associated with the pellicle.

Submitted on March 29, 1971







© The Company of Biologists Ltd 1971