spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Owens, N. F.
Right arrow Articles by Rutter, P. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Owens, N. F.
Right arrow Articles by Rutter, P. R.

Journal of Cell Science, Vol 87, Issue 5 667-675, Copyright © 1987 by Company of Biologists


JOURNAL ARTICLES

Inhibition of cell adhesion by a synthetic polymer adsorbed to glass shown under defined hydrodynamic stress

NF Owens, D Gingell and PR Rutter
Department of Anatomy and Biology, Middlesex Hospital Medical School, London, U.K.

A co-polymer with hydrophobic and hydrophilic segments was allowed to adsorb from aqueous solution onto glass previously made hydrophobic by derivatization with octadecyl dimethylchlorosilane. The polymer is thought to adsorb via its hydrophobic segments, leaving the hydrophilic segments free to extend into the water. After allowing cells to settle on the treated surface, the shear stress at the chamber wall required to remove red blood cells, Dictyostelium discoideum amoebae and Escherichia coli was determined in a calibrated laminar flow chamber. On octadecyl glass a shear stress of 2-3 Nm-2 evicts 50% of adherent red cells and E. coli. No D. discoideum amoebae could be removed at 5Nm-2. In striking contrast, the lowest experimentally obtainable shear stress of 0.03 Nm-2 removes 97.0-99.5% of cells of all three types from the polymer-treated surface, even after a cell residence time of 1 h without flow in the absence of free polymer. The minimum shear stress of 0.03Nm-2 corresponds to only approximately equal to 20 times the force of gravity on a red cell. The mechanism of action of the polymer and the implications of the results are discussed.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
MicrobiologyHome page
N. P. Boks, W. Norde, H. C. van der Mei, and H. J. Busscher
Forces involved in bacterial adhesion to hydrophilic and hydrophobic surfaces
Microbiology, October 1, 2008; 154(10): 3122 - 3133.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




© The Company of Biologists Ltd 1987