spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Erickson, C. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Erickson, C. A.

Journal of Cell Science, Vol 33, Issue 1 53-84, Copyright © 1978 by Company of Biologists


JOURNAL ARTICLES

Contact behaviour and pattern formation of BHK and polyoma virus-transformed BHK fibroblasts in culture

CA Erickson

Certain behavioural and morphological aspects of cellular transformation have been studied, using baby hamster kidney cells (BHK21/13) and polyoma virus-transformed BHK cells. BHK cellsgrow to monolayer arranged in parallel arrays, whereas the transformed cells show a much greater incidence of crisscrossing and multilayering. Time-lapse cinemicrography and scanning electron microscopy were used to examine the behaviour producing these striking differences in cellular pattern. It was found, contrary to previous thought, that in both cell lines, when contact is made ruffle to ruffle, ruffling is inhibited. When BHK cell contact each other ruffle to side, strong adhesions always occur, as evidence by a large deformation of the contacted cell margin, with accompanying paralysis of ruffling. Then, the contacting cell either changes direction, usually spreading along the side of the contacted cell, or occasionally continues to protrude and underlap the other cell, although the original adhesions are seen to remain. Transformed cells never form strong ruffle-to-side adhesions, and usually underlap each other totally. When the cells were filmed, fixed and the same cells relocated in the scanning electron microscope, neither cell type was seen to move over the surface of another (overlap). Rather, all cells crisscross by underlapping (moving under the other cell). SEM also reveals PyBHK cells to have many fewer side-to-substratum adhesions than BHK cells. The smaller number of these attachments could explain the ease with which PyBHK cells underlap.





© The Company of Biologists Ltd 1978