spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Scheer, U.
Right arrow Articles by Spring, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Scheer, U.
Right arrow Articles by Spring, H.

Journal of Cell Science, Vol 22, Issue 3 503-519, Copyright © 1976 by Company of Biologists


JOURNAL ARTICLES

Classification of loops of lampbrush chromosomes according to the arrangement of transcriptional complexes

U Scheer, WW Franke, MF Trendelenburg and H Spring

The arrangement of transcriptional units in the loops of lampbrush chromosomes from oocyte nuclei of urodele amphibia and from primary nuclei of the green alga Acetabularia have been studied in the electron microscope using spread preparations. Loops with different patterns of arrangement of matrix units (i.e. to a first approximation, transcriptional units) can be distinguished: (i) loops consisting of one active transcriptional unit; (ii) loops containing one active transcriptional unit plus additional fibril-free, i.e. apparently untranscribed, intercepts that may include 'spacer' regions; (iii) loops containing two or more transcriptional units arranged in identical or changing polarities, with or without interspersed apparent spacer regions. Morphological details of the transcriptional complexes are described. The observations are not compatible with the concept that one loop reflects one and only one transcriptional unit but, rather, lead to a classification of loop types according to the arrangement of their transcriptional units. We propose that the lampbrush chromosome loop can represent a unit for the coordinate transcription of either one gene or a set of several (different) genes.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Mol. Biol. CellHome page
A. J. Smith, Y. Ling, and G. T. Morgan
Subnuclear Localization and Cajal Body Targeting of Transcription Elongation Factor TFIIS in Amphibian Oocytes
Mol. Biol. Cell, March 1, 2003; 14(3): 1255 - 1267.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Biol. CellHome page
C. Murphy, Z. Wang, R. G. Roeder, and J. G. Gall
RNA Polymerase III in Cajal Bodies and Lampbrush Chromosomes of the Xenopus Oocyte Nucleus
Mol. Biol. Cell, October 1, 2002; 13(10): 3466 - 3476.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant BiolHome page
W. W. Franke, U. Scheer, M. Trendelenburg, H. Zentgraf, and H. Spring
Morphology of Transcriptionally Active Chromatin
Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol, January 1, 1978; 42(0): 755 - 772.
[Abstract] [PDF]




© The Company of Biologists Ltd 1976