spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chatterjee, S.
Right arrow Articles by Bhattacharjee, S. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Chatterjee, S.
Right arrow Articles by Bhattacharjee, S. K.

Journal of Cell Science, Vol 19, Issue 1 117-126, Copyright © 1975 by Company of Biologists


JOURNAL ARTICLES

Effect of near ultraviolet and visible light on amoeba

S Chatterjee and SK Bhattacharjee

The near ultraviolet and visible light (VL) impinging at an intensity of 2-5 x 10(2) J s-1 m-2 for 2-5 h kills the mitotic and the early S-phase (0- to 15-min-old) amoebae. At the mid- and late S-period only a fraction of cells are killed by VL and G2 phase cells are quite resistant. Amoebae of all cell cycle stages show a delay in the first mitotic division. DNA synthesis, as measured by [3H]thymidine incorporation, is depressed in the VL-exposed early-S amoebae. A concurrent but temporary inhibition in [3H]leucine incorporation also occurs in these cells. However, no significant change in [3H]uridine incorporation has been found. To localize the site of lethal damage, nuclear transplantation studies were undertaken between the control amoebae and the amoebae treated with VL. The nucleus of a VL-exposed early S-phase cell recovers when transplanted immediately after VL exposure into an enucleate G2 cytoplasm but dies if grafted into an enucleat S-phase cytoplasm. The therapeutic effect of the G2 cytoplasm, although at a lower level, is also evident even when the treated early S-phase nucleus is implanted 20 h later, but not after 48 h, into the G2 cytoplasm. The amoeba cytoplasm shows resistance to VL-irradiation, can accept a control nucleus from any cell cycle stage, and function normally. The G2 nucleus also remains apparently unaffected to VL exposure and can survive when it is transfered to the control cytoplasm of any cell-cycle phase. All these findings are discussed in the light of the possible existence of a repair system against VL-induced damage in the G2-phase amoeba.





© The Company of Biologists Ltd 1975