QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s):
Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents

First published online 8 April 2008
doi: 10.1242/jcs.020024

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Supplementary Material All Versions of this Article: jcs.020024v1 121/9/1403    most recent Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Google Scholar Articles by Erben, V. Articles by Petritsch, C. PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Erben, V. Articles by Petritsch, C.

Asymmetric localization of the adaptor protein Miranda in neuroblasts is achieved by diffusion and sequential interaction of Myosin II and VI

Veronika Erben^1,*, Markus Waldhuber^1,2,*, Diana Langer¹, Ingrid Fetka¹, Ralf Peter Jansen¹ and Claudia Petritsch^1,2,3,4,

¹ GeneCenter, Ludwig-Maximilian-University Munich, Department of Biochemistry and Laboratory of Molecular Biology, 81377 Munich, Germany
² Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, 513 Parnassus Avenue, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA
³ Brain Tumor Research Center, University of California, San Francisco, 513 Parnassus Avenue, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA
⁴ Helen Diller Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, 513 Parnassus Avenue, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA

Author for correspondence at present address: University of California, San Francisco (UCSF), Department of Neurological Surgery, 513 Parnassus Avenue, San Francisco, CA 94143-0520, USA (e-mail: claudia.petritsch{at}ucsf.edu)

Accepted 5 February 2008

The adaptor protein Miranda plays a pivotal role in the asymmetric cell division of neuroblasts by asymmetrically segregating key differentiation factors. Miranda localization requires Myosin VI and Myosin II. The apical-then-basal localization pattern of Miranda detected in fixed tissue, and the localization defects in embryos lacking Myosin VI, suggest that Miranda is transported to the basal pole as a Myosin VI cargo. However, the mode and temporal sequence of Miranda localization have not been characterized in live embryos. Furthermore, it is unknown whether Miranda and PON, a second adaptor protein required for asymmetric protein localization, are both regulated by Myosin II. By combining immunofluorescence studies with time-lapse confocal microscopy, we show that Miranda protein forms an apical crescent at interphase, but is ubiquitously localized at prophase in a Myosin-II-dependent manner. FRAP analysis revealed that Miranda protein reaches the basal cortex by passive diffusion throughout the cell, rather than by long-range Myosin VI-directed transport. Myosin VI acts downstream of Myosin II in the same pathway to deliver diffusing Miranda to the basal cortex. PON localization occurs mainly along the cortex and requires Myosin II but not Myosin VI, suggesting that distinct mechanisms are employed to localize different adaptor proteins during asymmetric cell division.

Key words: Mechanism for asymmetric cell division, Stem cells, Miranda, PON, Myosin II and VI

This article has been cited by other articles:

				V. Erben, M. Waldhuber, D. Langer, I. Fetka, R. P. Jansen, and C. Petritsch Asymmetric localization of the adaptor protein Miranda in neuroblasts is achieved by diffusion and sequential interaction of Myosin II and VI Development, May 15, 2008; 135(10): e1 - e1. [Full Text]