spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif spacer gif
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


spacer gif
     Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents    


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by BRADLEY, M. O.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by BRADLEY, M. O.

Journal of Cell Science, Vol 12, 327-343, Copyright © 1973 by Company of Biologists

Submitted on March 17, 1972

Microfilaments and Cytoplasmic Streaming: Inhibition of Streaming with Cytochalasin

M. O. BRADLEY 1

1 Department of Biological Sciences, Stanford University Stanford, California 94305, U.S.A.

Cytochalasin B reversibly inhibits cytoplasmic streaming in both Nitella and Avena cells. Colchicine, on the other hand, has no effect on streaming in either plant; nor does colchicine prevent the recovery of streaming after cytochalasin is withdrawn. The inhibition of protein synthesis by cycloheximide has no effect on either streaming itself or on the recovery of streaming after cytochalasin withdrawal. All this suggests that microfilaments may provide one component of the structure that generates the streaming force and that microtubules play little, if any,role in the process.

Ultrastructural studies of Nitella demonstrate that microfilaments are localized at the boundary of the streaming endoplasm and the stationary ectoplasm. Microfilaments are organized in discrete bundles, with possible cross-bridges between individual filaments in each bundle. These bundles are closely associated with the extensive endoplasmic reticulum.

Cytochalasin B does not cause ultrastructural changes in Nitella microfilaments as it does in some animal-cell filaments. Since the molecular mechanism of cytochalasin's action is unknown, there may be no necessary correlation between functional inhibition by the drug and altered microfilament morphology.

A model is advanced which proposes that streaming is generated by an interaction between microfilaments and the endoplasmic reticulum.

Note:
Address for reprint requests: Department of Medical Microbiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, 94305, U.S.A.

Submitted on March 17, 1972




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Plant Cell PhysiolHome page
I. Foissner and G. O. Wasteneys
Wide-Ranging Effects of Eight Cytochalasins and Latrunculin A and B on Intracellular Motility and Actin Filament Reorganization in Characean Internodal Cells
Plant Cell Physiol., April 1, 2007; 48(4): 585 - 597.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
C. Holweg and P. Nick
Arabidopsis myosin XI mutant is defective in organelle movement and polar auxin transport
PNAS, July 13, 2004; 101(28): 10488 - 10493.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Plant Cell PhysiolHome page
G. Jedd and N.-H. Chua
Visualization of Peroxisomes in Living Plant Cells Reveals Acto-Myosin-Dependent Cytoplasmic Streaming and Peroxisome Budding
Plant Cell Physiol., April 15, 2002; 43(4): 384 - 392.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




© The Company of Biologists Ltd 1973