|
|
|
||||
| Home Help Feedback Subscriptions Archive Search Table of Contents | |||||
First published online 31 October 2006
doi: 10.1242/jcs.03243
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Research Article |
Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA
* Author for correspondence (e-mail: Erica.Johnson{at}jefferson.edu)
Accepted 6 September 2006
Saccharomyces cerevisiae contains two Siz/PIAS SUMO E3 ligases, Siz1 and Siz2/Nfi1, and one other known ligase, Mms21. Although ubiquitin ligases are highly substrate-specific, the degree to which SUMO ligases target distinct sets of substrates is unknown. Here we show that although Siz1 and Siz2 each have unique substrates in vivo, sumoylation of many substrates can be stimulated by either protein. Furthermore, in the absence of both Siz proteins, many of the same substrates are still sumoylated at low levels. Some of this residual sumoylation depends on MMS21. Siz1 targets its unique substrates through at least two distinct domains. Sumoylation of PCNA (proliferating cell nuclear antigen) and the splicing factor Prp45 requires part of the N-terminal region of Siz1, the `PINIT' domain, whereas sumoylation of the bud neck-associated septin proteins Cdc3, Cdc11 and Shs1/Sep7 requires the C-terminal domain of Siz1, which is also sufficient for cell cycle-dependent localization of Siz1 to the bud neck. Remarkably, the non-sumoylated septins Cdc10 and Cdc12 also undergo Siz1-dependent sumoylation if they are fused to the short
KXE SUMO attachment-site sequence. Collectively, these results suggest that local concentration of the E3, rather than a single direct interaction with the substrate polypeptide, is the major factor in substrate selectivity by Siz proteins.
Key words: Smt3, Ubc9, PIAS, SP-RING, Protein modification
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. Garcia-Dominguez, R. March-Diaz, and J. C. Reyes The PHD Domain of Plant PIAS Proteins Mediates Sumoylation of Bromodomain GTE Proteins J. Biol. Chem., August 1, 2008; 283(31): 21469 - 21477. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Schwamborn, P. Knipscheer, E. van Dijk, W. J. van Dijk, T. K. Sixma, R. H. Meloen, and J. P.M. Langedijk SUMO Assay with Peptide Arrays on Solid Support: Insights into SUMO Target Sites J. Biochem., July 1, 2008; 144(1): 39 - 49. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
X. L. Chen, H. R. Silver, L. Xiong, I. Belichenko, C. Adegite, and E. S. Johnson Topoisomerase I-Dependent Viability Loss in Saccharomyces cerevisiae Mutants Defective in Both SUMO Conjugation and DNA Repair Genetics, September 1, 2007; 177(1): 17 - 30. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||