QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s):
Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents

First published online February 23, 2005
doi: 10.1242/10.1242/jcs.01684

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Supplementary Material Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Thakar, R. Articles by Csink, A. K. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Thakar, R. Articles by Csink, A. K.

Changing chromatin dynamics and nuclear organization during differentiation in Drosophila larval tissue

Department of Biological Sciences, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA

^* Author for correspondence (e-mail: csink{at}andrew.cmu.edu

Accepted 14 December 2004

Global changes in gene expression and exit from the cell cycle underlie differentiation. Therefore, understanding chromatin behavior in differentiating nuclei and late G1 is key to understanding this developmental event. A nuclear event that has been shown to specifically occur in late G1 is the association of two heterochromatic blocks in Drosophila. The brown^Dominant (bw^D) chromosome of Drosophila melanogaster contains a large block of heterochromatin near the end of 2R. This distal block associates with centric heterochromatin (2Rh), but not until at least 5 hours into G1. We used the bw^D allele as a model for nuclear organization to determine whether its association with the heterochromatic compartment of the second chromosomes (2Rh) strictly requires differentiation or if this change is a stochastic event, its occurrence being proportional to time spent in G1/G0 phase of the cell cycle. Fluorescence in situ hybridization on eye imaginal discs showed increased association between the bw locus and 2Rh in differentiated cells. Interestingly, an increase in the number of nuclei showing bw^D-2Rh association in the brains of developmentally delayed larvae that were compromised for differentiation was also observed. Live fluorescence imaging showed that the kinetics of chromatin movement remains unchanged in the developmentally arrested nuclei. These observations suggest that nuclear reorganization is not directly controlled by specific inductive signals during differentiation and that this nuclear reorganization can happen in a cell, regardless of differentiation state, that is arrested in the appropriate cell cycle stage. However, we did see changes that appear to be more directly correlated with differentiation. Dynamic imaging in eye imaginal discs showed that the movement of chromatin is more constrained in differentiated cells, implying that confinement of loci to a smaller nuclear space may help to maintain the changed organization and the transcription profile that accompanies differentiation.

Key words: Nuclear organization, Chromatin dynamics, Differentiation, Heterochromatin

This article has been cited by other articles:

				P. Nisha, J. L. Plank, and A. K. Csink Analysis of Chromatin Structure of Genes Silenced by Heterochromatin in Trans Genetics, May 1, 2008; 179(1): 359 - 373. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. T. Sage, M. D. Wu, and A. K. Csink Interplay of Developmentally Regulated Gene Expression and Heterochromatic Silencing in Trans in Drosophila Genetics, February 1, 2008; 178(2): 749 - 759. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				I. U. Rafalska-Metcalf and S. M. Janicki Show and tell: visualizing gene expression in living cells J. Cell Sci., July 15, 2007; 120(14): 2301 - 2307. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. Thakar, G. Gordon, and A. K. Csink Dynamics and anchoring of heterochromatic loci during development J. Cell Sci., October 15, 2006; 119(20): 4165 - 4175. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]