|
|
|
||||
| Home Help Feedback Subscriptions Archive Search Table of Contents | |||||
First published online 2 November 2004
doi: 10.1242/jcs.01504
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Research Article |
1 Institute of Botany, University of Vienna, Rennweg 14, 1030 Vienna, Austria
2 Institute for Radiation Biology Bw, Neuherbergstrasse 11, 80937 Munich, Germany
* Author for correspondence (e-mail: josef.loidl{at}univie.ac.at)
Accepted 19 August 2004
During meiotic prophase in the ciliate Tetrahymena thermophila micronuclei dramatically elongate and form thread-like crescents. The arrangement of the chromosomes within the crescent as well as the timing of chromosome pairing and recombination with respect to the elongation process have been subjects of ongoing debate. Here, we addressed these issues by means of fluorescence in situ hybridization, labeling of individual chromosomes by BrdU (BrdU-painting) and by immunostaining of the recombination protein, Rad51. BrdU-painting indicated that chromosomes are arranged as parallel bundles within the crescent, and telomere-directed fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) revealed that most if not all telomeres are assembled near one end of the developing crescent. Prior to full crescent formation, Rad51 localizes to chromatin as numerous foci. Locus-specific FISH demonstrated that close pairing of homologues only occurs in the full crescent. Meiotic DNA double-strand break formation and the initiation of recombination thus seem to precede close pairing. A synaptonemal complex was not detected. We conclude that the chromosomes adopt a polarized arrangement within the crescent, probably resembling the classical bouquet arrangement. Furthermore, we propose that the elongated shape of meiotic micronuclei promotes the parallel arrangement of chromosomes and supports the juxtaposition of homologous regions in the absence of a synaptonemal complex. Several pieces of evidence indicate the presence of one to four chiasmata per bivalent, which would call for crossover interference to explain regular bivalent formation in spite of this low mean number. Tetrahymena might, therefore, pose a case of interference in the absence of a synaptonemal complex.
Key words: Chromosome pairing, Meiosis, Recombination, Rad51, Protists
Related articles in JCS:
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
L. Aronica, J. Bednenko, T. Noto, L. V. DeSouza, K.W. M. Siu, J. Loidl, R. E. Pearlman, M. A. Gorovsky, and K. Mochizuki Study of an RNA helicase implicates small RNA-noncoding RNA interactions in programmed DNA elimination in Tetrahymena Genes & Dev., August 15, 2008; 22(16): 2228 - 2241. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Mochizuki, M. Novatchkova, and J. Loidl DNA double-strand breaks, but not crossovers, are required for the reorganization of meiotic nuclei in Tetrahymena J. Cell Sci., July 1, 2008; 121(13): 2148 - 2158. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
X. Song, E. Gjoneska, Q. Ren, S. D. Taverna, C. D. Allis, and M. A. Gorovsky Phosphorylation of the SQ H2A.X Motif Is Required for Proper Meiosis and Mitosis in Tetrahymena thermophila Mol. Cell. Biol., April 1, 2007; 27(7): 2648 - 2660. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. de Boer, A. J. J. Dietrich, C. Hoog, P. Stam, and C. Heyting Meiotic interference among MLH1 foci requires neither an intact axial element structure nor full synapsis J. Cell Sci., March 1, 2007; 120(5): 731 - 736. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. S. Yakisich, P. Y. Sandoval, T. L. Morrison, and G. M. Kapler TIF1 Activates the Intra-S-Phase Checkpoint Response in the Diploid Micronucleus and Amitotic Polyploid Macronucleus of Tetrahymena Mol. Biol. Cell, December 1, 2006; 17(12): 5185 - 5197. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Cui, Y. Liu, and M. A. Gorovsky Deposition and Function of Histone H3 Variants in Tetrahymena thermophila Mol. Cell. Biol., October 15, 2006; 26(20): 7719 - 7730. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Cui and M. A. Gorovsky Centromeric Histone H3 Is Essential for Vegetative Cell Division and for DNA Elimination during Conjugation in Tetrahymena thermophila Mol. Cell. Biol., June 15, 2006; 26(12): 4499 - 4510. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. D. Cervantes, R. S. Coyne, X. Xi, and M.-C. Yao The Condensin Complex Is Essential for Amitotic Segregation of Bulk Chromosomes, but Not Nucleoli, in the Ciliate Tetrahymena thermophila Mol. Cell. Biol., June 15, 2006; 26(12): 4690 - 4700. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. D. Cervantes, X. Xi, D. Vermaak, M.-C. Yao, and H. S. Malik The CNA1 Histone of the Ciliate Tetrahymena thermophila Is Essential for Chromosome Segregation in the Germline Micronucleus Mol. Biol. Cell, January 1, 2006; 17(1): 485 - 497. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||