QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s):
Home     Help     Feedback     Subscriptions     Archive     Search     Table of Contents

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Taylor, S. S. Articles by Morrow, C. J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Taylor, S. S. Articles by Morrow, C. J.

Kinetochore localisation and phosphorylation of the mitotic checkpoint components Bub1 and BubR1 are differentially regulated by spindle events in human cells

School of Biological Sciences, University of Manchester, 2.205 Stopford Building, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PT, UK
¹ Department of Biological Chemistry and Molecular Pharmacology, Harvard Medical School, 240 Longwood Avenue, Boston MA 02115, USA
^* Present address: Department of Biology, Imperial College of Science Technology and Medicine, London SW7 2AZ, UK

Author for correspondence: stephen.taylor{at}man.ac.uk

Accepted September 6, 2001

BUB1 is a budding yeast gene required to ensure that progression through mitosis is coupled to correct spindle assembly. Two related human protein kinases, Bub1 and BubR1, both localise to kinetochores during mitosis, suggesting that they play a role in delaying anaphase until all chromosomes achieve correct, bipolar attachment to the spindle. However, how the activities of Bub1 and BubR1 are regulated by spindle events and how their activities regulate downstream cell cycle events is not known.

To investigate how spindle events regulate Bub1 and BubR1, we characterised their relative localisations during mitosis in the presence and absence of microtubule toxins. In prometaphase cells, both kinases colocalise to the same domain of the kinetochore. However, whereas the localisation of BubR1 at sister kinetochores is symmetrical, localisation of Bub1 is often asymmetrical. This asymmetry is dependent on microtubule attachment, and the kinetochore exhibiting weaker Bub1 staining is typically closer to the nearest spindle pole. In addition, a 30 minute nocodazole treatment dramatically increases the amount of Bub1 localising to kinetochores but has little effect on BubR1. Furthermore, Bub1 levels increase at metaphase kinetochores following loss of tension caused by taxol treatment. Thus, these observations suggest that Bub1 localisation is sensitive to changes in both tension and microtubule attachment.

Consistent with this, we also show that Bub1 is rapidly phosphorylated following brief treatments with nocodazole or taxol. In contrast, BubR1 is phosphorylated in the absence of microtubule toxins, and spindle damage has little additional effect. Although these observations indicate that Bub1 and BubR1 respond differently to spindle dynamics, they are part of a common complex during mitosis. We suggest therefore that Bub1 and BubR1 may integrate different ‘spindle assembly signals’ into a single signal which can then be interpreted by downstream cell cycle regulators.

Key words: Mitosis, Spindle checkpoint, Bub1

This article has been cited by other articles:

				R. Bharadwaj, W. Qi, and H. Yu Identification of Two Novel Components of the Human NDC80 Kinetochore Complex J. Biol. Chem., March 26, 2004; 279(13): 13076 - 13085. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. B. Shannon, J. C. Canman, and E. D. Salmon Mad2 and BubR1 Function in a Single Checkpoint Pathway that Responds to a Loss of Tension Mol. Biol. Cell, October 1, 2002; 13(10): 3706 - 3719. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Zhou, J. Yao, and H. C. Joshi Attachment and tension in the spindle assembly checkpoint J. Cell Sci., September 15, 2002; 115(18): 3547 - 3555. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. Hussein and S. S. Taylor Farnesylation of Cenp-F is required for G2/M progression and degradation after mitosis J. Cell Sci., January 9, 2002; 115(17): 3403 - 3414. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]